Is your office understaffed?

Do you think your office is understaffed?

Have you had to justify the number of positions in your office to upper management?

Or maybe you’ve wondered how your office staffing compares to similar sized utilities?

Overstaffed Understaffed

Here’s your chance to find out…

Confirming my suspicions

In a recent business review I completed for a customer, I suspected their office was understaffed. In order to determine if my suspicions were correct, I e-mailed 30 of Logics’ largest customers and asked a handful of questions about staffing.

The results of that informal survey were intriguing enough to make me want to conduct a more formal survey across a larger base of utilities.

To accomplish this, I’ve developed a Utility Staffing Survey. In addition to asking how many positions your office has, the survey includes questions about labor intensive practices such as payment processing and bill printing.

Complete the Utility Staffing Survey

Please click here to complete the Utility Staffing Survey. This should take less than five minutes to complete. I will publish the results in a future Utility Information Pipeline.

Please feel free to share this survey with your peers at other utilities.

Thank you in advance for taking the time to complete the survey and sending to other utilities.

Additional resources

In the past, I’ve written about valuable resources for utilities. One of these is the Environmental Finance Center at UNC. The Environmental Finance Center recently developed a new Financial Health Checkup for Water Utilities Tool. This free tool is designed to help assess the financial performance of your water and/or wastewater utility.

I’ve mentioned SmallWaterSupply.org newsletter in the past as a resource for small water utilities. They are still providing the same great information, but they’ve changed their name to the easier to remember WaterOperator.org. You can read more about the name change here.

Could your office be more efficient?

If you think your office is understaffed or could run more efficiently, please give me a call at 919-232-2320 or e-mail me at gsanders@logicssolutions.com to learn how a business review could help your utility.

Click here to subscribe to my free, bi-weekly e-mail newsletter...

© 2016 Gary Sanders

Reader Spotlight – City of Graham

This is the first in what I hope becomes a regular feature of the Utility Information Pipeline that I’m calling “Reader Spotlights”. In each Reader Spotlight issue I will highlight an initiative undertaken by a reader of the Utility Information Pipeline.

Effective July 1 of last year, at the start of the current fiscal year, the City of Graham North Carolina changed the way they assess late fees and the amount they charge as a cut-off fee for non-payment. They also implemented, for the first time, a fee for initiating service.

Frankie Maness, Graham City Manager, said “Delinquent accounts have been a longstanding problem for the City and we have debated many times on methods to mitigate the costs. During this past budget season I ran across a Utility Information Pipeline from 2012 that indicated our fees, when compared to our peers, were way overdue for an update. With Gary’s assistance, we have now implemented changes and the results are starting to show increased revenue and a reduced burden from these accounts. At the same time, we implemented a Service Initiation Fee which has also generated additional revenue.”

With Gary’s assistance, we have now implemented changes and the results are starting to show increased revenue and a reduced burden from these accounts.

If you’re interested, here’s a link to the 2015 Utility Fee Survey results issue with more current data than the issue Frankie referenced above.

Let’s take a look at the changes they implemented…

Change in how late fees are calculated

Prior to July 1, Graham charged a flat $5.00 late fee to all customers, regardless of the amount of the past due bill. Effective July 1, they implemented a hybrid late fee of 2% of the outstanding balance with a minimum of $5.00.

For the period of July through December, this minor change in the way late fees are calculated impacted only 2.85% of the customers who were charged a late fee. However, it resulted in a 16.97% increase in revenue from those customers!

Here is a graph of the late fee amounts over the $5.00 minimum that were charged (clicking on the any of the graphics will open a larger image in a new window):

Graham Late Fees in Excess of Minimum

As you can see, nearly half of the customers who were impacted still paid $10.00 or less in late fees. However, the top 15 customers accounted for nearly $3,000.00 in increased revenue. In fact, in spite of the increased late fees, one account in the top 15 was still late every month! Your utility doesn’t have any customers like this, does it?

A month-by-month comparison of the same period from the previous year shows the number of accounts charged a late fee didn’t change appreciably:

Graham Number of Accounts Charged Late Fee

In fact, over the same period, 95 more customers were charged a late fee in 2015 than 2014.

Increased cut-off fees

At the same time, Graham increased their cut-off fee (they wisely call it a Nonpayment Fee) from $15.00 to $40.00. This higher fee resulted in 24.33% fewer customers on the cut-off list generating 101.79% more revenue! The details are shown below:

Graham Cut-Off Fee Comparison

Unlike the change in late payment penalty, this increase in the nonpayment fee did have a significant impact on the number of customers on the cut-off list, as compared to the same period the year before:

Graham Number of Accounts Cut-Off

Interestingly, the increased cut-off fee reduced the number of accounts on the cut-off list from 3.20% to 2.42% of Graham’s customer base. This moved them from the “room for improvement” to “normal range” on my acceptable range scale for accounts on the cut-off list.

New service initiation fee

The third initiative in the FY 2015-2016 budget for the City of Graham was the establishment of a Service Initiation Fee. This is an administrative fee charged to each new customer applying for utility service and is designed to recoup the cost of initiating service.

For the period of July through December 2015, this new fee generated $3,720.00 in additional revenue.

How up-to-date are your fees?

If, like the City of Graham, you think your fees may be outdated or in need of review, please give me a call at 919-232-2320 or e-mail me at gsanders@logicssolutions.com to learn how a business review could help your utility.

A special offer

To celebrate the inaugural Reader Spotlight issue, I’m offering a special offer to the first five Utility Information Pipeline readers who respond. If you are one of the first five to respond, I will conduct a personalized fee consultation for one-third off the regular price! That’s $1,000 rather than the usual $1,500 price for this service.

I will review your utility’s current fee schedule and conduct an in-depth phone assessment to learn more about your fees. You will receive a presentation quality document illustrating how your fees compare with other utilities. Also included will be my recommendations for revising any existing fees and suggestions of new fees you should consider charging.

If you are interested in this special offer, please contact me by calling 919-232-2320 or e-mailing me at gsanders@logicssolutions.com. Remember, the discounted special offer is only available to the first five people who respond.

Would you like to be featured in a Reader Spotlight?

Has your utility adopted new policies or streamlined procedures as a result of something I’ve written here or presented at a speaking engagement?

If so, please give me a call at 919-232-2320 or e-mail me at gsanders@logicssolutions.com to discuss including your initiative in a future Utility Information Pipeline.

Click here to subscribe to my free, bi-weekly e-mail newsletter...

© 2016 Gary Sanders

Are you still filing paper documents…?

Are you feeling overwhelmed with paper documents?

Does your office have a file room filled with filing cabinets that looks like this?

If so, do you wish you could do away with them?

FilingCabinets

Paperless office

Many utility offices are striving to eliminate, or at least reduce, the amount of paper they generate and file. Let’s take a look at some easy ways to decrease the amount of paper kept in filing cabinets.

Billing software

Does your billing software allow you to file attachments with each customer’s account record? If so, are you taking advantage of it?

Many billing software applications offer a way to add electronic attachments, including scanned documents and digital photographs, to customer records. This can include customer correspondence, copies of service applications, scanned driver’s licenses, and completed service orders.

Document imaging system

If the volume of paper your office handles is too large to file with each individual utility account, a document imaging system may be for you.

Most document imaging systems are capable of automatically indexing scanned documents. These indexes can be built around commonly accessed data, such as account numbers or customer names. Once a document has been indexed, it can be easily retrieved via a search on one of the indexes.

Some document imaging systems can be integrated with billing software applications to facilitate document retrieval from within the billing system.

Create your own electronic filing cabinet

So, if your billing software doesn’t allow for attachments and you can’t afford a document imaging system, does that mean you are stuck with filing cabinets forever?

Of course not! Create your own electronic filing system!

To do this, if you have a local server, simply use a shared network drive that is accessible to all your users. If you don’t have a local server, you can use a cloud service such as Google Docs. Create a folder structure that makes sense, similar to how you would organize file drawers in a filing cabinet. For example, if you currently file paper documents by account number, create a folder for each account, scan the documents, and copy them to the appropriate folder.

Could your office be more efficient?

If you think your office could operate more efficiently, please give me a call at 919-232-2320 or e-mail me at gsanders@logicssolutions.com to learn how a business review could help your utility.

Click here to subscribe to my free, bi-weekly e-mail newsletter...

© 2016 Gary Sanders

Happy fifth anniversary!

This issue marks the fifth anniversary of the Utility Information Pipeline! About five and a half years ago I had a “what if…” idea. What if I took my accumulated experiences and wrote about them in a newsletter? Would people be interested? How long could I sustain it? Well, the answers to those questions are “yes” and “five years and counting” thanks to you, my readers!

Subscribers continue to increase, by 10% again this year. If you have co-workers or colleagues from other utilities who you feel would benefit from reading this newsletter, please take a minute and forward this to them and encourage them to subscribe.

New feature

In the coming year, I will be introducing a new feature called “Reader Spotlights”.

These will be opportunities to highlight Utility Information Pipeline readers and initiatives they have implemented as a result of something I’ve written here or presented at a speaking engagement.

If you have adopted new policies or streamlined procedures based on something you’ve read here, please let me know by calling 919-232-2320 or e-mailing me at gsanders@logicssolutions.com.

Blog makeover

If you haven’t checked out my blog recently, I encourage you to do so. I’ve recently updated the theme to give it a fresh look. If you view my blog from a smartphone or tablet, this new format should be very easy to read. Each Utility Information Pipeline newsletter article is also posted to my blog as an archive. So if you can’t find an old newsletter in your inbox that you wish you still had, try searching for it on my blog.

Additional rates dashboards

In the process of updating my blog, I realized the Environmental Finance Center at UNC has added several more rates dashboards since my original post in July of 2013. To see if there is a rates dashboard for your state, click here to see the updated original post.

Most popular blog posts

This year, late fees was the most popular blog post, edging out convenience fees, which was the top post for the previous three years. Here are the five most popular blog posts in terms of page views for 2015:

  1. How much is your late fee?
  2. Can we charge a convenience fee for credit card payments…?
  3. Do you have a cash handling policy?
  4. Utility Fee Survey Results – Part I
  5. Utility Fee Survey Results – Part II

Ideas, anyone…?

As you might imagine, after five years, topics to write about aren’t as easy to come up with as they were when I first started! If you have a question, idea, or suggestion of a topic that you would like to learn more about, please give me a call at 919-232-2320 or e-mail me at gsanders@logicssolutions.com.

Happy New Year!

I wish you and yours all the best for a happy, healthy, and prosperous 2016!

Click here to subscribe to my free, bi-weekly e-mail newsletter...

© 2015 Gary Sanders

Do you document customer interactions?

The last issue discussed reading inactive meters for vacant accounts and included a poll asking if your utility reads inactive meters.

Poll results

Ten utilities responded to the poll, and here are the results (clicking on the the graphic will open a larger image in a new window):

Do you read inactive meters

If you missed the poll, you can click here to take it.

While only ten utilities responded to the poll, I’m pleased to see that 70% of the respondents do read inactive meters. I’m especially glad to see the one utility that still reads on paper is reading inactive meters!

What really surprised me is the utility that reads using an automated meter reading system and doesn’t read inactive meters. Frankly, this baffles me. Unlike reading on paper or with handhelds, where the meter reader must take additional time to read inactive meters, reading with an AMR or AMI system takes no extra time. So why not read inactive meters?

Documenting customer interactions

Does your utility keep a record of all customer interactions? For example, if a customer calls to complain about a high bill or request additional time to pay their bill, do you log a comment for that?

Documenting each conversation with a customer can prove invaluable if the customer complains

Documenting each conversation with a customer can prove invaluable if the customer complains to management or your board. Customers tend to remember their version of a phone call and having an accurate record of what transpired during the call can easily resolve a “he said, she said” situation when the customer suffers from selective memory.

I encourage all of our customers to enter a comment for any conversation with a customer beyond the routine “how much is my bill and when is it due?” questions. Any good billing system allows you to enter comments for each customer. If yours doesn’t, it’s time to look for new software! If your billing software won’t allow you to enter comments for each customer, give me a call and let’s discuss how a business review could help determine what other shortcomings your software has.

Share your stories

Have you experienced a situation where having documented a customer conversation proved invaluable later? If so, please click here to take a moment share your story in the comments section of this post on my blog.

Are you using your software to your best advantage?

If you aren’t sure your utility is using your software to its best advantage, or if you realize it’s time for new software, please give me a call at 919-232-2320 or e-mail me at gsanders@logicssolutions.com to learn how a business review could help you understand what new software could do for you.

Click here to subscribe to my free, bi-weekly e-mail newsletter...

© 2015 Gary Sanders

Poll results and vacant accounts

The last issue revisited how the number of days between meter readings and sending bills can adversely contribute to increased days of exposure.

Poll results

That issue included a poll asking how many days pass between reading meters and mailing bills. Twenty utilities responded, and here are the results of that poll:

If you missed the poll, you can click here to take it.

If your utility is one that mails bills within two or three days of reading meters, congratulations, you’ve figured out how to do it efficiently!

If your utility falls in the four to seven day range, this is what I would call normal – there’s room for improvement, but it’s not excessive.

However, if your utility takes eight or more days, as the majority of the responses, I consider this to be excessive. I would encourage you to evaluate why it takes so long and see if you can find room for improvement. If you can’t figure out how to reduce the time between reading and billing on your own, please give me a call to see how a business review could assist you.

Reading inactive meters

While we’re on the topic of meter readings, let’s revisit reading inactive meters for vacant accounts, a topic I touched on briefly while discussing meter reading best practices.

From the best I can tell, in most cases the practice of not reading inactive meters is a symptom of the TTWWADI syndrome

From the best I can tell, in most cases the practice of not reading inactive meters is a symptom of the TTWWADI syndrome, dating back to when most utilities read meters on paper and entered them manually. Not reading inactive meters was thought to be a time saving tactic for both the meter readers and office staff.

With the advent of handhelds and automated meter reading systems, there is no reason not to read inactive meters. Reading inactive meters is your best tool for detecting customers who may have moved into a vacant home without properly initiating service. For water utilities, it’s also the best way to determine if there is a leak at a vacant property.

Do you read inactive meters?

Does your utility read inactive meters? Please take a moment to to take this quick poll and I’ll publish the results in the next issue.

Do you operate as efficiently as possible?

If you aren’t sure your utility is operating as efficiently as it could be, please give me a call at 919-232-2320 or e-mail me at gsanders@logicssolutions.com to learn how a business review could help your utility.

Click here to subscribe to my free, bi-weekly e-mail newsletter...

© 2015 Gary Sanders

Revisiting days of exposure

I’ve written previously about minimizing days of exposure, and it’s a topic that deserves revisiting.

Components of days of exposure

If you remember, the total days of exposure is comprised of six different components:

  • Days between meter readings
  • Days until bills are mailed
  • Days until due date
  • Days until bills are delinquent
  • Days until final notice is mailed
  • Days until cut-off

One of the areas you have the most control over is how many days elapse between reading meters and mailing bills.

An actual scenario

Recently, while visiting with a customer, I asked the manager how long it takes them after reading meters to review the meter readings, calculate bills and send the bill file to the outsource printer.

The answer, which took me totally by surprise, was three weeks. When I questioned this, the response was the billing staff says that’s how long it takes. I didn’t press the issue, although I strongly suspected this may be a case of the TTWWADI syndrome.

The conversation continued on to how a particular customer’s misread meter was handled. The manager went to get the paperwork for the specific case in question and it turns out two full weeks had passed between the date the meter reading edit list was printed and when the field technician reread the meter.

How long does it take you?

I can think of no good reason why it should take two full weeks to get a reread returned to the office.

How long does it take your office between reading meters and mailing bills? Please take a moment to take this quick poll and I’ll publish the results in the next issue.

Is your office guilty of this?

The billing clerks for this customer are new hires since the system was installed and could probably benefit from followup training. I wasn’t even conducting a business review and this customer benefited from free consulting. Just imagine what a complete business review might discover!

If you think the way you process rereads (or do anything else in your office, for that matter) takes longer than it should, please give me a call at 919-232-2320 or e-mail me at gsanders@logicssolutions.com to learn how a business review could help your utility.

Click here to subscribe to my free, bi-weekly e-mail newsletter...

© 2015 Gary Sanders

Do you honor postmarks for late payments…?

Quite the surprise to me, two different utilities I visited in the past month both honor payments postmarked by the due date as on-time payments, even if the payment isn’t received in the utility office until days after the due date.

Lots of additional work

In a time when most utility offices are trying to find ways to be more efficient (think automated meter reading , outsource bill printing, and online bill pay), honoring postmarks increases your workload twofold:

  • The person opening the mail must examine the postmark of every mail payment received after the penalty is applied.
  • For any payments that were postmarked before the due date, an adjustment must be entered to remove the penalty from the affected account.

In what for many utilities may simply be a case of the TTWWADI syndrome, honoring postmarks continues because no one has questioned the practice.

Are you legally required to do it?

From my research, the best I can tell, this is modeled after the way taxes are collected. Statutorily, some taxing entities (does April 15 come to mind?) are required to honor payments postmarked by the due date as being paid on time.

Do you think your customer’s credit card or mortgage companies check the postmarks of every payment they receive?

If you still aren’t convinced, please take a minute to Google “utility bill payments postmark” and see how many utilities do and do not honor postmarks.

If you aren’t legally required to honor postmarks and you still do, I encourage you to stop. If this is part of an ordinance or a rate tariff, take it up with the governing body or utility commission and revise your ordinance or tariff. If it is simply a policy, alert your customers and change your policy.

Do you have antiquated processes?

If you think the way you process payments (or do anything else in your office, for that matter) is outdated, please give me a call at 919-232-2320 or e-mail me at gsanders@logicssolutions.com to learn how a business review could help your utility.

Click here to subscribe to my free, bi-weekly e-mail newsletter...

© 2015 Gary Sanders

How do you account for returned checks?

From time to time, I get asked about the best way to handle returned checks. Let’s take a look at a couple things I always recommend.

Do post the returned check to the customer’s account

Some utilities choose not to post the returned check to the customer’s account, instead holding the check until the customer honors it with cash. This is a bad business practice for several reasons.

The history of past returned checks is often used to decide whether to continue accepting checks from a customer. If previous bad checks aren’t in the system, this becomes more difficult to determine. If your ordinances or policy allows for it, a history of returned checks can be reason to charge or increase a security deposit.

If the returned check isn’t part of the customer’s balance, it can be overlooked when charging late fees and selecting accounts for the cut-off list.

If you offer a fully integrated online bill pay system the customer can see their balance and honor the returned check with an online credit card payment.

Also, be sure you add the returned check fee to the customer’s account. This is just as much a part of what they now owe as the returned check itself.

Don’t reverse the original payment

Many billing systems go to all the trouble of reversing the original payment when a returned check is processed. With these systems, if a check is returned that was originally applied to services in multiple funds (for example, electric, water, and garbage), the system will debit the accounts receivable and credit the cash accounts in each fund.

I recommend using a single returned checks receivable account

Rather than doing all that, I recommend using a single returned checks receivable account. In a multiple fund environment, this is usually in the General Fund (following the theory that processing returned checks is a general administrative task). However, if your receivables are heavily skewed toward one of your enterprise funds, you could choose to put the returned checks receivable account in this enterprise fund.

Why use a returned checks receivable account?

The case for using a returned checks receivable account can be made for a couple reasons:

Reinstating the original accounts receivable technically isn’t a correct accounting practice because you did collect the bill, but the check bounced.

By tracking returned checks separately, you are maintaining a subsidiary ledger of all outstanding returned checks. At any point in time, adding up all your returned checks should agree with the balance of the retuned checks receivable account.

Need assistance?

If you have questions about processing returned checks or any other part of your office operation, please give me a call at 919-232-2320 or e-mail me at gsanders@logicssolutions.com to learn how a business review could help your utility.

Click here to subscribe to my free, bi-weekly e-mail newsletter...

© 2015 Gary Sanders

What are these barcodes on my bills?

Sometimes, when doing a sales presentation, I will ask if a utility prints payment barcodes on their bills. On more than a few occasions, I’ve had people confuse the postal barcode with a payment barcode.

What are the differences between the two? Let’s take a look…

Postal barcodes

Postal barcodes are the most common barcode found on utility bills. These barcodes, known as Intelligent Mail barcodes (IMb), are used by the Postal Service for sorting mail using high speed optical scanners. In order to receive any type of postal discount for your mailings, you must print the IMb on your mailpiece.

Placement of the IMb depends on the type of bills you print. For post card bills, the IMb can print either print immediately above or below the address block or in the lower right corner of the bill. If you print full page bills, either in-house or using an outsource printer, the IMb will print immediately above or below the address block, so it shows through the window envelope.

An IMb barcode is composed of four distinct symbols (tracking region only, ascending, descending and both ascending and descending) and looks like this:

Intelligent Mail barcode

Payment barcodes

Payment barcodes are used to expedite the process of entering payments. These barcodes generally encode at least the customer’s account number and amount due.

When entering payments in a system configured for processing barcodes, the user merely scans the barcode rather than keying in the customer’s account number. This can be used by cashiers handling walk-in payments or by a customer service representative entering mail payments in batches.

Payment barcodes generally look more like a traditional barcode (not unlike the UPC barcode used by most grocery stores) composed of narrow and wide bars of uniform height. Here is an example of a payment barcode:

Payment Barcode

Need assistance?

If you have questions about printing bills, processing payments or any other part of your office operation, please give me a call at 919-232-2320 or e-mail me at gsanders@logicssolutions.com to learn how a business review could help your utility.

Click here to subscribe to my free, bi-weekly e-mail newsletter...

© 2015 Gary Sanders